It'd be interesting to know how much of the relationship between Howard and Lea Thompson got toned down, like if Huyck and Katz originally had them more visibly romantically involved. It wouldn't be interesting to see cut scenes or even to read old drafts of the script, it'd just be interesting to know. Seeing cut scenes or reading the script would require one to endure more of this intolerable production.
Howard the Duck has absolutely nothing to recommend it. Casting Richard Kiley as the Voice of the Cosmos aside, it's worthless. All I could think, as the terribly acted Duck got to Earth and met Thompson was--these people wrote American Graffiti. The duck planet scenes at the beginning, which should have been amusing and inventive is more instead tired. There's no exuberance to the scenes, they're mundane. As a director, Huyck is never willing to acknowledge Howard the Duck's idiocy. It's about a talking duck who gets it on with a human girl. It ought to be dumb, fun and outlandish--and aware of it. Instead, it's all about not selling out the music for the man. It's embarrassing to watch it, much less to imagine having participated in its making in any capacity.
I'm not real familiar with the comic books, but the movie Howard is a unfunny whiner who's mad he had to get a job. I can only figure the comic book Howard is probably a funny whiner. The occasional promises of a smoking and drinking duck are never realized (he gets whisked to Earth before he lights his cigar and his beer later magically disappears into PG-land). Sadly, Howard the Duck probably isn't even the worst of the atrocious teen-minded sci-fi movies on the mid-1980s, just the most famous.
The acting is unspeakable. Lea Thompson has never been really good so her inability to act opposite a guy in a costume who talks (the cast of "Alf" did far better) is no surprise. But Tim Robbins? Robbins is awful. Jeffrey Jones is awful. Some of the blame has to fall on the script and direction, but good acting might have made it a little less unbearable.
As for the costumed Howard the Duck... the costume's not detailed enough to be convincing in regular shots. It looks like a television commercial. And Chip Zien's vocal performance as Howard might be the worst thing in the movie, which is a hard thing to be.
The only other thing worth commenting on is John Barry's score. When I saw his name in the opening titles, I figured at least the music would be good. It isn't. It's John Barry trying to be zany. It's a metaphor for the whole movie--a bunch of squares pretending to be zany and not even managing to make an unconventional failure.
CREDITS
Directed by Willard Huyck; screenplay by Huyck and Gloria Katz, based on the Marvel comic book by Steve Gerber; director of photography, Richard H. Kline; edited by Michael Chandler and Sidney Wolinsky; music by John Barry; production designer, Peter Jamison; produced by Katz; released by Universal Pictures.
Starring Lea Thompson (Beverly Switzler), Jeffrey Jones (Dr. Walter Jenning), Tim Robbins (Phil Blumburtt), Paul Guilfoyle (Lieutenant Welker) and Ed Gale and Chip Zien (Howard T. Duck).
Related posts:
Chip Butty // Jun 24, 2008 at 11:53 pm
I discovered the Howard comic books by (I think) having first heard of the movie and then finding the old issues at my local comics shop for a buck apiece.
They were literally life-changing. Steve Gerber’s Howard The Duck runs the character through all sorts of meandering deconstructionist-superhero type adventures (a la The Tick, or Doom Patrol…)
And all the while, in every issue, Howard grapples with the existential angst of being a funny talking animal in a world of hairless apes. He’s the ultimate outsider. Trapped in a world he never made!
It’s really hard to describe. Imagine something as thoughtful, funny and clever as this movie is stupid. With roughly the same content. Except for Beverly being in a rock band…
Terry Glenn // Mar 28, 2009 at 9:30 am
Are you serious? You wrote this review in 2008! Yes, by today’s standards the duck was unrealistic. But so was Gremlins or Jaws or compared to today’s graphics. And the acting? It was a goofy silly movie, and Robbins played it that way. He did fine. And Jones? Scary and comical at the same time. Quite fitting. And did you even watch this movie all the way through? He puffs on a lit cigar on several occasions. He even blows the smoke in someone’s face. And let’s just remind ourselves one more time that this was made in 1986. Have you seen other movies made in the 80’s? Bad acting and over-acting was kinda the style of the times: Back to the Future, Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.…need I go on? Hell, tell me honestly that Judd Nelson’s performance as the tough guy in The Breakfast Club was anything more than pure 80’s cheese. Think back on the acting quality of these movies, and tell me Howard the Duck was any different. It’s a classic that was awesome when I saw it in 1988, and yes, a little cheesy when I watched it again in 2009. But that was to be expected. Such is the fate of most comedy/sci-fi/adventure movies when re-watched 20 years later.
tamara // Oct 29, 2009 at 9:00 pm
ugh ! i wish that every htd website that i visit will stop saying that they had sex when they did not they are just friends i have seen this movie hundreds of times and i see a friendship between howard and beverly not a romantic one